2 questions

[23Zone]

I use 1-10 too... now its even.

[Magic Bird]

23Zone, Wayne23, what do you like about the 1-10 system (or not like about the 1-100 scale)?

[Wayne23]

I haven't used 1-100 in years. I guess I just think 1-10 is simpler. Having said that, you have me rethinking it. Maybe I'll give 1-100 another shot. I mean there's obviously a hell of a difference between 61 and 69, for example.

[Magic Bird]

I haven't used 1-100 in years. I guess I just think 1-10 is simpler. Having said that, you have me rethinking it. Maybe I'll give 1-100 another shot. I mean there's obviously a hell of a difference between 61 and 69, for example.

In the past when I used the 1-10 scale, I grew tired of situations like having two PGs with equal ratings but one would average 5-6 assists per game in a starting role while the other would only average 3-4 apg as the starter. When I exported the database to look at their actual ratings, I found that the difference between their passing ratings was significant even though they had the same rating under the 1-10 system. I encountered similar situations with posts and their rebounding ratings. If I remember correctly, sometimes the difference in actual rating values exceeded double digits.